- The Runway Ventures
- Posts
- 🤦🏻♂️ The founders quit
🤦🏻♂️ The founders quit
How ZestMoney went from $450M to $0
Hey Founders,
Welcome to The Runway Ventures — a weekly newsletter where I deep dive into failed startup stories to help you become the top 1% founder by learning from their mistakes with actionable insights.
Let’s get to it! 🚀
Today at a Glance:
☠️ 1 Failed Startup → ZestMoney
⚠️ 2 Mistakes → The business model didn’t make sense
🧠 3 Lessons Learned → Don’t rely on funding to run your business
🔗 The Runway Insights → 10 Books for Founders, by Founders
💰 Southeast Asia Funding Radar → Superbank raises $73.2M from Grab, Singtel, and more
☠️ 1 Failed Startup: ZestMoney
🚀 The Rise of ZestMoney
Founded by 3 founders (Lizzie Chapman, Priya Sharma, and Ashish Anantharaman) in 2015, ZestMoney was a BNPL (Buy Now, Pay Later) platform that allowed consumers to make purchases and pay for them in instalments without needing a credit card.
The Problem — Millions of people in India were facing the lack of traditional access to credit due to the low credit card penetration.
💳 Low credit card penetration meant many people didn’t have credit scores.
🙅🏻♂️ Without credit scores, traditional banks were hesitant to offer small loans due to low or negative returns.
Because of that, many Indians couldn’t afford purchases and access financial products.
The Solution — ZestMoney democratised credit availability by using alternative data points to build credit profiles for consumers, enabling them to make their first online purchases and access financial products previously out of reach. Its BNPL solution solved problems for 2 parties:
🕺🏻 For consumers — People could shop for various products without needing a credit score or card.
🛍️ For merchants — Retailers (i.e. Amazon, Flipkart, MakeMyTrip) could get more customers with higher conversion rates.
Check anything out,
checkout with Zest
🏔️ At its peak, ZestMoney had a registered user base of 17 million and was live at 85,000 retail touchpoints across India.
💰 The company raised over $130 million from high-profile investors, including Goldman Sachs, Ribbit Capital, and Omidyar Network, and was valued at $445 million in its last equity round in 2022.
It seems that ZestMoney was poised to become the largest BNPL platform in India, but was it? Here’s when everything collapsed during a funding winter 🥶👇🏻
📉 The Fall of ZestMoney
The collapse of ZestMoney began when the acquisition deal with PhonePe fell through in early 2023. This was the final nail in the coffin as the company had exhausted nearly all other funding sources.
The failure to secure this deal led to a series of unfortunate events…
📌 Here’s what happened to ZestMoney:
2015 — ZestMoney was founded.
2022 — Raised over $130M with a valuation of $445M.
June 2022 — Huge regulatory changes ⛔️
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued a notification forbidding operating non-bank institutions or fintech companies, including BNPL services, from loading credit lines onto Prepaid Payment Instruments (PPI) such as wallets and prepaid cards.
This move impacted many BNPL players in India, including ZestMoney. Since then, the company started looking for a buyer.
Jan-May 2023 — The potential acquisition ($200M-$300M) by PhonePe fell through citing issues with due diligence.
⚠️ PhonePe had concerns about ZestMoney’s high default rates, debt liabilities of $35-$40 million, valuation asks, and synergies post-acquisition.
🪓 Without runway left, ZestMoney laid off 100 employees (20% workforce).
👋🏻 The 3 founders announced their resignation and quit.
The new management team took over ZestMoney but still couldn’t revive the company.
Dec 2023 — ZestMoney officially shut down and laid off the remaining employees.
🥵 From Buy Now, Pay Later to Die Now, See You Later
🎢 Startup life is full of the highs and lows, just like ZestMoney. Despite its innovative approach and significant traction, the company still died due to regulatory changes and a tough funding environment.
Want to learn more about ZestMoney’s downfall?
⚠️ 2 Mistakes
Mistake 1: The business model didn’t make sense
For BNPL business models like ZestMoney, it deals with 3 parties (Consumers, Lending Partners, Merchants). Here’s how it makes money with an example:
🕺🏻 Consumers
You bought an iPhone for $1,000 at no cost. You just need to pay it back in instalments over a 3-6 month period without any interest.
💵 1st revenue — You’d be penalised for a fee if you delay a payment.
🏦 Lending Partners
One of its 27 lending partners would disburse $1,000 to pay for your iPhone.
If you default, ZestMoney will be liable.
💵 2nd revenue — ZestMoney will take a $50 cut as the fee for its service (i.e. KYC checks, customer service).
🛍️ Merchants
Merchants will be paid $950 immediately.
They agree to take the hit because they can push the purchase.
As you can see, ZestMoney only made money from 2 sources of revenue with thin margins. This business model was highly risky for 2 reasons:
💸 High default rates
The whole BNPL business bets on its capability to evaluate consumers’ credit risks based on alternative data. If the credit scoring algorithm fails, default rates increase, ZestMoney would be liable for these debts.
🤯 According to The Ken, ZestMoney’s default rate was sky-high at 13%. Typically, BNPL companies need to keep it below 2.5%.
That means ZestMoney was liable for all these liabilities, which was one of the reasons why PhonePe rejected the acquisition.
🔥 High customer acquisition costs
ZestMoney spent lots of money to run ads and deploy employee workforce on the ground to get customers.
ZestMoney spent around ₹1,000 rupees to acquire a single customer.
It needed each customer to have at least 4 BNPL loans per year to make money, but its customers opted for 2 loans on average.
It wasn’t enough to cover the costs, hence losing money.
🧠 Why I think the business model didn’t make sense
For the credit scoring algorithm to improve, it needs to learn from historical data with default loans. Here’s where the whole business contradicts the tech:
→ BNPL companies want to reduce default loans
→ But credit scoring algorithm couldn’t become better without default loans
The result? BNPL companies like ZestMoney got to keep raising money to cover default loans, continue training the ML model, and hopefully it had enough runway to “potentially” become profitable by reducing its default rates.
Therefore, from a technical and business standpoint, the business model didn’t make sense. What do you think? Reply and let me know 🤝🏻
Mistake 2: Single point of failure
🧑🏻💼 One of the biggest risks in fintech is regulation. Today you’re running smoothly, tomorrow your company might be dead if there are disruptive changes in your country’s law — which is what happened to ZestMoney.
📉 After the Reserve Bank of India tightened regulatory scrutiny on BNPL companies, suddenly ZestMoney’s monthly loan disbursals fell by 75%.
No loan disbursals, no revenues, high CAC, high default rates, and mounting debts and liabilities. The regulatory changes are probably the single point of failure that killed ZestMoney.
🧠 3 Lessons Learned
Lesson 1: Don’t rely on funding to run your business
The current BNPL business model is very risky. However, it doesn’t have to be this way for non-BNPL businesses. If you can bootstrap from Day 1, you’ll have full control and won’t need to rely on investors to support your business.
🌟 Key Takeaways:
💰 Positive unit economics
If you spend $10 to acquire a customer, and the customer pays you $5, you still lose $5.
Unless you have a solid plan to reduce CAC or charge higher, chances are your business will not survive.
In short, make sure your unit economics makes sense.
Lesson 2: Anticipate and prepare for changes
Changes are the only constant in business.
If you’re operating as if everything stays the same in the next 3-5 years, then you would be very disappointed. Adapt well, adapt fast.
🌟 Key Takeaways:
🫨 Be paranoid
Always think about what might kill your business in the next 3-5 years, be it the regulator environment, market trends, customer behaviour or competitors.
Your company is fine today doesn’t mean it’ll be fine tomorrow.
Be paranoid. Identify disasters ahead and prepare before the storm comes.
Lesson 3: Have corporate governance in place
Right after PhonePe declined the acquisition, all the founders hastily resigned and quit the company — as if they no longer wanted to deal with the shit (I mean ship… 🚢).
This shows that the founders already had a plan to exit if the acquisition fell through, raising questions internally. When they left, new management took over, but the ship still sank.
🌟 Key Takeaways:
⚠️ Prepare for crisis management
When key leaders leave a company, strong corporate governance should be in place to ensure continuity and stability without disruption.
Develop a comprehensive crisis management plan that includes procedures for various potential crises, such as leadership departures, financial difficulties, or regulatory changes.
For example, we can create a step-by-step plan for communicating with stakeholders in the event of a leadership crisis.
🔗 The Runway Insights
💰 Southeast Asia Funding Radar
Superbank raises $73.2M from Grab, Singtel, and more (Link)
Hubble raises $5M to help contractors receive early payments based on progress (Link)
Partior raises US$60M in Series B to expand capabilities in real-time clearing and settlement (Link)
Nami, the Vietnamese rooftop solar startup, raises $10M from Clime Capital (Link)
Nika.eco raises oversubscribed seed round for AI-powered climate models (Link)
💃 Rate Today’s Edition
What'd you think of today's edition?Your feedback helps me create better content for you! |
🌟 Top Review of the Week
That’s all for today
Thanks for reading. I hope you enjoyed today's issue. More than that, I hope you’ve learned some actionable tips to build and grow your business.
You can always write to me by simply replying to this newsletter and we can chat.
See you again next week.
- Admond
🤝🏻 Join our founders community on Discord:
Building a startup is one of the toughest things you can do. Why struggle alone when you have our community to help and support you.
This is the founders community I wished I had when I first started.
Disclaimer: The Runway Ventures content is for informational purposes only. Unless otherwise stated, any opinions expressed above belong solely to the author.
Reply